Author: David Dehne

  • Peace on Earth and Goodwill Between Sales and Production

    Peace on Earth and Goodwill Between Sales and Production

    Manufacturing sales and productionThe decorations. The music. The food. The holiday season is a time of cheer and goodwill for many people. Nevertheless, there are two groups who may find each other especially trying this time of year: sales and production. That’s because this isn’t just the holiday season; it’s also the end of the fiscal year for many organizations. While everyone else has visions of sugarplums dancing in their heads, sales has a vision of only one thing: making quota.

     

    ‘Tis the Season

    It’s common knowledge that not every salesperson reaches their quota, but what you may not know is that that’s by design. Sales management theory suggests that 60 to 70% of people making quota is about right. Higher than that and you’ve set quotas too low.manufacturing sales quota

    Unfortunately, sales managers don’t always care about sales management theory. Their compensation is based off making their collective quota. If only 60% of their people make quota, they probably won’t be taking that extended family vacation this year. The actual number of reps hitting quota in most organizations is closer to 50%, which puts even more pressure on sales managers and their direct reports. In the heat of the moment, salespeople often make promises, such as faster delivery dates, without having all the information.

    Demand-Driven Manufacturing Puts the “Happy” Back in the New Year

    When I talk with salespeople, many of them tell me they don’t like the end of year situation any more than their counterparts in production. The problem is that everything happens so quickly, the customer is playing hardball (buyers know they have the upper hand this time of year), and the rep needs to close the business.Demand-Driven Manufacturing for sales and production

    It’s time to break out of the vicious cycle that happens every December and often enough throughout the year as well. To do so, we need to look at the underlying causes – not counting the tremendous pressure on sales to make quota, which we’ve already covered and isn’t going to change. Instead, we’ll focus on what’s in our control:

    • Many ERP manufacturing systems only consider material availability, not available capacity.
    • Sales doesn’t have visibility into what’s possible.
    • Adjusting production schedules to accommodate orders is time-consuming and often creates more problems than it solves.Capable-to-promise date

    SyncManufacturingTM can solve these challenges. The software’s Capable-to-Promise Date (CTPD) functionality looks not only at material availability, but also at capacity. What-if analyses can be performed to determine realistic delivery dates, given the current production load. This helps sales avoid the mistake of over-promising, and it gives them an advantage. They don’t have to turn away business that they could accept if only they had visibility into what was possible.

    It’s worth noting that this frees up production planners as well. They’re no longer responding to urgent requests from sales asking for shorter delivery times or readjusting schedules to accommodateReal-time adaptive scheduling sales already made. When an order is accepted, the scheduling engine in SyncManufacturing automatically adjusts the production schedule, improving asset utilization and minimizing lead times for all orders.

    Sales and Production are just two groups that benefit from applying Demand-Driven Manufacturing principles. If you’d like to learn more about the enterprise-wide benefits, download: The Enterprise-wide Impact of Synchronized Planning, Scheduling, and Production Execution.

  • Thought Leadership: Three Key Strategies of Modern Demand-Driven Manufacturing

    Thought Leadership: Three Key Strategies of Modern Demand-Driven Manufacturing

    Today’s manufacturers are meeting complex market demands while maintaining desired levels of customer satisfaction, supplier performance and production throughput by applying Modern Demand-Driven Manufacturing strategies that enable a more connected environment and serve as the catalyst for progressive concepts, including:

    • The Industrial Internet of Things
    • Smart Manufacturing
    • Synchronized Planning, Scheduling and Execution
    • End-to-end Supply Chain Visibility

    Download this paper for an overview of the three key strategies of Modern Demand-Driven Manufacturing

  • Guest Blog Part 2: Start Your eKanban Implementation with Value-stream Mapping and Engaging Your Suppliers

    Guest Blog Part 2: Start Your eKanban Implementation with Value-stream Mapping and Engaging Your Suppliers

    by Jim Shore

    Through this guest blog series, my intent is to share some of my experiences implementing supplier quality and Lean manufacturing initiatives by focusing on eKanban systems. My first post offered advice for planning an eKanban rollout (advice that could be applied across any Lean manufacturing project). In this installment, I’d like to talk about strategies for rolling out an eKanban project that have proven successful for me.

     

    Whether you use Google maps, Apple, MapQuest or some other breed of navigation, you know you must enter both a starting location (or allow the system to “know” your current location) – and a desired destination. Too often, I see manufacturers get excited about the destination of best-practice process improvement without carefully considering the starting point.

     

    Value-Stream

    The Value in Value-Stream Mapping

    In my view, the process starts by gaining a clear understanding of the current, “as is” state, because you can’t make process improvements unless you can explain the problem you are working to resolve. With eKanban implementations, this can be any number of problems including excess materials on hand, slow inventory turns, too much scrap and more.

    So, once you have universal buy-in on the project (see Guest Blog1: Real-world Advice for Getting Started on eKanban), the first step toward execution is to develop a good process, or value-stream map. For an eKanban project, this would involve documenting the flow of the current, manual Kanban process. (If you’re not using a manual Kanban system, map the current inventory replenishment process.) Next, document the process for the future state – using an eKanban system – and note the gaps. The goal is to identify the processes that do not provide value (e.g. waste) so they can be eliminated or improved upon.

    Take the time to ensure you’ve mapped out everything. It may seem tedious, but it is worthwhile. For example, in one facility I worked with, it took us a day to develop a good process map. Over the course of the exercise, we found multiple variations in the current, 66-step process that produced excess waste. For example, they were literally logging 7 miles a year to track down inventory! Once we streamlined our map and implemented the eKanban system, the process was trimmed to just 6 steps. The exercise exceeded expectations, providing all team members with quantifiable value of the project.

    document the process flow

    Before I move on, I want to take a moment to tie the value-stream mapping exercise to the key take-aways from the first blog in the series: Communication and buy-in. Those involved in developing the process maps will likely buy into its outcomes, hopefully becoming vocal advocates of the eKanban project. As in the example above, the mapping exercise also provides useful data points for leaders and others to communicate across the organization.

    Strategies for Getting Suppliers on Board

    Some manufacturers experience supplier resistance to a new electronic Kanban solution. This push-back may stem from the perception that they are being forced to adopt new technology, pay the price, and/or hold the risk.

    This criticism is based on the idea that when a supplier holds the inventory, they hold all the risk. One manufacturer I worked with had a unique solution to this dilemma. First, they started their eKanban implementation with a software pilot in a controlled area of their organization – and engaged just their top three suppliers. The manufacturer approached these three suppliers and entered into to a contract with them where they would assume half of the risk. Then they created a test environment where they could get the suppliers comfortable with the software. The suppliers received training on various scenarios, became familiar with email communications they would be receiving – and gained visibility into the supplier portal where they could monitor the manufacturer’s consumption and/or receive replenishment signals.

    Supplier engagement

    The manufacturer also gave their suppliers an incentive by including their eKanban software usage as part of their performance rating.

    By taking more of a partnership approach with their suppliers, the suppliers became more engaged and, in fact, found their own benefits in using the system. One of the suppliers, while finding the software easy to understand, liked the ability to monitor demand through the eKanban supplier portal. Another supplier who was initially concerned about having excess inventory, found the eKanban system allowed them to better level-load. As a result, they reduced their over-time costs and were able to increase capacity without added expense. A win-win for all.

    The Pilot Program and Beyond

    As was demonstrated in the use case above, a pilot (or vendor free trial) is not only helpful for suppliers, but for internal adoption and continuous improvement. Starting an eKanban implementation on an isolated line or work cell allows you to work out any kinks or issues before rolling out the software to other areas. Internal chatter about the system starts to take hold and, based on my experience, employees start hoping their area is next in line.

    Measuring manufacturing metrics

    Beyond the pilot program, it’s time to start measuring progress toward what you set out to accomplish – and the metrics that will influence those outcomes. The manufacturer in my example established metrics for baseline inventory reductions and increased inventory turns and were able to recoup their initial software investment before implementation was complete.

    Metrics typically associated with eKanban projects include:

    • Inventory turns/Inventory cost
    • Replenishment lead time
    • Stock buffer health
    • Supplier performance
    • Freight costs

    Improving these metrics often contribute to corporate-level goals of expense reduction, improved on-time delivery and greater throughput.

    Keep the Goals Top-of-Mind

    When executing a transformative process, ensure no one loses sight of the mission. Continually reinforce the value of the outcomes and regularly communicate progress toward goal attainment. This not only helps to set expectations as you roll out the project, but creates anticipation for its results.

    In summary, for a successful eKanban project rollout, here are the steps I recommend:

    1. Map the current and future states of the process.
    2. Start focused – implement a pilot in a controlled area, make necessary adjustments and continue rolling out through a pragmatic approach.
    3. Partner with your suppliers to make the implementation a win-win.
    4. Monitor your metrics.

    As you think about eKanban – or similar Lean projects in your organization – I hope you find this insight helpful. Next time, I’ll address post-implementation strategies of “listening to the process” and focused continuous improvement.

    Jim Shore is the Principal of Quality Lean Solutions, a Consultant Firm that specializes in Medical Device companies, Supplier Quality and Lean Manufacturing principles.  Mr. Shore is co-author of “Proactive Supplier Management in the Medical Device Industry” (2016: Quality Press). Jim has 25 years of quality and supplier management experience in medical devices, semiconductor, aerospace and defense for firms and organizations including Titan Medical, Nypro Healthcare, Boston Scientific, Aspect Medical, Brooks Automation, Raytheon and ACMI Gyrus (now Olympus). He is Six Sigma Black Belt and Quality Manager/Operations Excellence-certified by the American Society for Quality (ASQ), as well as an ASQ-certified Quality Auditor and Mechanical Inspector. A veteran of Operation Desert Storm, he served in the U.S. Marine Corps for more than 15 years.

     

     

  • Thought Leadership: Three Key Strategies of Modern Demand-Driven Manufacturing

    Thought Leadership: Three Key Strategies of Modern Demand-Driven Manufacturing

    Thought Leadership: Three Key Strategies of Modern Demand-Driven Manufacturing

    Today’s manufacturers are meeting complex market demands while maintaining desired levels of customer satisfaction, supplier performance and production throughput by applying Modern Demand-Driven Manufacturing strategies that enable a more connected environment and serve as the catalyst for progressive concepts, including:

    • The Industrial Internet of Things
    • Smart Manufacturing
    • Synchronized Planning, Scheduling and Execution
    • End-to-end Supply Chain Visibility

    Download this paper for an overview of the three key strategies of Modern Demand-Driven Manufacturing.

  • FAQ: What is the Difference Between Pull Manufacturing and Demand-Driven Manufacturing?

    FAQ: What is the Difference Between Pull Manufacturing and Demand-Driven Manufacturing?

    Pull and Demand-Driven Manufacturing

     

     

     

     

    I often talk about pull manufacturing and Demand-Driven Manufacturing as though they are one and the same. That’s because, in my mind, they are. However, after reading through a couple of online articles this afternoon, it’s clear not everyone sees it that way. In fact, some of the various ways pull manufacturing is described on the Internet can be a bit confusing.

    In pull manufacturing, replenishment of raw materials or components is triggered by downstream demand. For example, if an order for 100 widgets is released into the system, it will pull production through the system from raw materials orders all the way through to the finished goods.

    Demand orders signal replenishment

    There is an important distinction made by some writers between pull and Demand-Driven manufacturing: the demand signal. For me, the order for 100 widgets is triggered by demand from an end-customer in both pull- and Demand-Driven Manufacturing. Working backwards, 100 widgets are sold at retail, which in turn creates a replenishment order for 100 widgets at the distributor, which translates into an order for 100 widgets at the manufacturer.

    However, some proponents of pull manufacturing argue that the pull signal can also come from 100 widgets that will sit unsold on a shelf in the warehouse waiting for a customer order. Because production is being pulled from a demand signal downstream, it is still pull manufacturing even if it isn’t customer demand driven. This seems to me like putting a pull veneer on push thinking, and it can limit your ability to achieve your objectives because, even if you can reduce WIP inventory levels, you still run the risk of excess finished goods inventory and a lot of waste.

    safety stock for raw materials

    When I get to this point in the discussion with manufacturers who are new to Demand-Driven Manufacturing, they often ask a good question: Can I still have safety stock? For decades, we’ve been conditioned to setting safety stock levels for raw materials and key components. Doing without them can seem like performing a high-wire act without a net.

     

    Is There a Place for Safety Stock in a Demand-Driven World?

    In a perfect world, all production in Demand-Driven Manufacturing is triggered by an actual order, eliminating any excesses in raw materials, WIP inventory, or unsold finished goods. But, whoever said we live in a perfect world?

    Most Demand-Driven Manufacturers will still do some level of forecasting of demand, but it’s more for long-term planning than short-term production. Buffer stocks are also a feature of Demand-Driven Manufacturing, but it’s important to understand the difference between safety stock and buffer stock. The Lean Enterprise Institute describes it this way:

    “The terms buffer aLean principles - rocks and water nd safety stock often are used interchangeably, which creates confusion. There is an important difference between the two, which can be summarized as: Buffer stock protects your customer from you (the producer) in the event of an abrupt demand change; safety stock protects you from incapability in your upstream processes and your suppliers.”

    In other words, safety stock is excess inventory that is designed to cover inefficiencies in your production processes. If you’ve studied Lean principles, you probably remember the rocks and water example. The rocks are the problems in your factory such as scrapped production runs, long set up times, and unplanned downtime. Inventory is the water that covers these rocks so that they don’t impact your ability to serve your customers. This excess inventory removes the urgency to make long-term improvements, which means real improvements are seldom made and inventory levels remain excessively high.

    In Lean Manufacturing (and Demand-Driven Manufacturing) inventory should not be used to cover a problem. Instead the problem should be resolved. However, many Lean and Demand-Driven manufacturers will still use buffer stocks to protect their customers from variability in demand.

    For some real-world case studies highlighting the benefits of pull manufacturing/Demand-Driven Manufacturing as it was meant to be, we invite you to visit our web site.

     

     

     

     

     

“test”