Tag: synchronize

APS + MES = Real-Time Precision
How SyncManufacturing^® APS and Solumina MES Work Together to Close the Loop Between Planning and Execution
Despite unprecedented access to computing power and advanced systems, many manufacturers still rely on spreadsheets, tribal knowledge, and disconnected point systems to manage production. This means their days are often spent chasing down information, working to outdated schedules, and losing customer confidence as promised deliveries slip. In complex environments, even small delays can quickly build into major issues as they ripple across sites, work centers, and interdependent work orders.

Are Your Systems Synchronized–Or Merely Integrated?

In many production environments, systems are technically “connected,” yet the organization fails to achieve the promised benefits of a truly synchronized operation. When we look beneath the surface, we see that although the systems are integrated, they are anything but synchronized.

The shortcomings of this kind of integration surface quickly as operations managers are forced to create workarounds—exporting, cleaning, reconciling, and reformatting data because it is not truly aligned. When they attempt to use the information, timestamps do not match, statuses and priorities conflict, and planners and supervisors spend more time debating whose report is correct rather than discussing performance. What began as an integration issue ultimately becomes a data integrity problem.

In complex manufacturing environments, this has real financial and operational consequences. When data is only shared periodically, the organization operates on outdated information, leaders spend more time reconciling reports than making decisions, and shop‑floor teams learn to distrust priorities that do not reflect what they see on the line. Over time, the costs show up as higher expediting spend, missed delivery commitments, inefficient use of constrained resources, and eroding confidence in the production management process itself.

Synchrono® and iBase-t have partnered to address this challenge by creating a synchronized planning and execution solution that continuously aligns what has been promised and planned to what is really happening on the shop floor. True synchronization is two‑way and real-time: what happens on the shop floor immediately impacts planning, and planning decisions are immediately reflected in execution. The result is a real‑time, constraint‑aware production system that guides your operations teams so they can deliver on customer commitments.

To see why this matters, it helps to look at the distinct role each system plays and what happens when SyncManufacturing APS and Solumina MES are truly synchronized rather than merely integrated.

SyncManufacturing: Advanced Planning and Scheduling for Complex Environments

Traditional ERP modules and spreadsheets do a good job of tracking orders, customers, and inventory, but were never built to manage real‑world constraints or create schedules aligned with constantly changing shop‑floor conditions. APS systems fill that gap by turning ERP and other data sources into a realistic, constraint‑aware schedule that adjusts in real time as conditions change.

SyncManufacturing from Synchrono is APS software designed for high‑mix, multi‑level, constraint‑intensive manufacturing. The system generates a finite‑capacity schedule that reflects actual material, labor, and equipment availability, and lets planners view and adjust schedules across sites, lines, and resources while automatically accounting for constraints such as tooling, changeovers, and downtime.

Solumina MES: The Execution Backbone

Solumina MES from iBase‑t is built for complex discrete manufacturing, including aerospace and defense, industrial equipment, and other highly engineered products. It serves as the execution backbone that manages production definitions, work instructions, routings, resources, quality, and genealogy across the enterprise. Operators use Solumina to execute work orders, capture data, record inspections, and manage nonconformances, while supervisors and engineers rely on it for visibility, traceability, and continuous improvement.

Equally important, Solumina is designed as a connected, data‑rich hub. Its open, modern architecture lets it exchange information with ERP, PLM, quality systems, and shop‑floor automation. That makes Solumina an ideal source of real‑time status information: actual start and finish times, machine and labor availability, WIP location, and quality events. APS engines like SyncManufacturing use this data to maintain schedule accuracy and actionability.

Real-Time, Closed-Loop Production Management

The synchronization of SyncManufacturing and Solumina creates a closed‑loop production management environment where information flows continuously between planning and execution. In this loop, every change on the shop floor feeds back into the schedule, and every updated schedule is immediately reflected in execution priorities.

Solumina supplies real‑time execution data: the status of each operation, resource availability, current WIP locations, and quality holds or rework requirements. As operators start, complete, or delay work, those events feed into SyncManufacturing, which re‑optimizes the production schedule to reflect the current shop‑floor reality. Operators see updated queues for each work center that are aligned with material availability, capacity constraints, and customer priorities, while supervisors can quickly understand the impact of disruptions, such as machine downtime, rush orders, and shortages, on downstream operations and due dates.

Empowering Planners and the Plant Floor

For planners, one of the biggest benefits is less time spent gathering information either from the plant floor or from disconnected systems. Instead of rebuilding the entire plan when conditions change, they work in a visual, interactive schedule powered by SyncManufacturing, where they can adjust sequences, evaluate trade‑offs, and immediately see downstream effects. Because the schedule is updated as Solumina reports actual progress and events, planners stop chasing static data and start managing performance.

For operators and supervisors, the day‑to‑day experience also improves. Operators receive clear, current priorities, reducing confusion and unproductive time spent waiting for instructions or material. They know which job should run next and why. Supervisors get real‑time dashboards showing bottlenecks, WIP levels, and key metrics such as schedule attainment, throughput, and resource utilization. When disruptions occur, they can rely on SyncManufacturing to guide their recovery and help them get production back on track.

Case Study:

From Manual Scheduling to Real-Time Precision: Digital Transformation with Synchrono® and iBase-t

View Case Study

Of course, the benefits of synchronized planning and execution systems extend beyond day‑to‑day efficiency. Manufacturers gain tangible improvements such as higher throughput, better on‑time delivery, and improved schedule reliability. By aligning resources with actual demand and constraints, organizations reduce inventory, minimize expediting, and improve margin on existing volume.

Strategically, the synchronization gives manufacturers tighter control over highly complex production, where a single customer order can drive hundreds or even thousands of interdependent work orders. By synchronizing planning and execution data, teams can see how changes ripple across shared resources and connected routings, understand the true cost and lead‑time impact of every decision, and prioritize work in a way that protects strategic goals, contracts, and delivery commitments.

Take the Next Step

If you’re feeling the pain of production management systems and processes that haven’t kept pace with your operations or strategic vision, it’s time to move to a more connected model. Schedule a demo of SyncManufacturing and learn how it integrates with Solumina MES to synchronize planning and execution.

Request a Demo
March 25, 2026
Synchronized Manufacturing: Using Supply Allocation to Orchestrate Complex Build Structures
It’s amazing to watch a school of fish swimming—each one turning, accelerating, and slowing in perfect unison, as if they were a single organism. Their very survival depends on synchronization. Staying tightly coordinated lets them react instantly to predators, shift around obstacles, and navigate a vast, unpredictable ocean.

Complex manufacturing environments work much the same way. To keep customers satisfied and costs under control, multi-level builds with dozens, or even hundreds, of interrelated work orders must move together with that same fluid coordination. When even one critical operation falls out of sync, the whole schedule ripples: delivery promises slip, priorities become confused, and planners are left scrambling to get everything back on track.

Supply Allocation, a new feature in SyncManufacturing Version 8, can help restore that “school of fish” coordination to your operations by recoupling every level of your build structure into a single, coherent flow.

The Hidden Complexity of Multi-Level Manufacturing

In complex manufacturing, every finished product often relies on a deep, multilevel bill of material with its own chain of supporting work orders. A single customer order can depend on hundreds of work orders, each with its own routing, lead times, and dependencies. Small delays deep in the build structure can cascade into major disruptions, expensive expediting, and late deliveries.

Two scheduling concepts were developed to help manufacturers address this issue: the critical path and the late path. Critical path is the sequence of activities that determines the overall project or order completion date. Tasks on this path have zero (or near-zero) float: If any of them slip, the order completion date slips by the same amount. Late path refers to the set of late start and late finish times calculated for activities in a schedule, showing how late each task can occur without delaying the overall completion date.

While transformative, these concepts were developed in the 1950s, at the very beginning of the computer age. Since then, industries such as aerospace and defense, automotive manufacturing, and heavy equipment have grown far more complex.

Where Manufacturing Theory Falls Short in Complex Manufacturing

Today, many manufacturers still rely on a mix of ERP or MRP systems with limited (if any) pegging logic linking parent work orders to supply. While these tools are helpful, even necessary, they were never designed to provide a truly synchronized, multilevel build plan.
- ERP/MRP systems often treat each work order as an isolated record rather than part of an end-to-end build structure for a specific customer order.
- Standard pegging logic shows only theoretical links between supply and demand, without clearly revealing which orders are at risk or how they affect downstream operations, making proactive action difficult.
- Planners must compensate for variability by manually resetting due dates to force alignment, a labor-intensive process that quickly becomes unmanageable as priorities and constraints shift.
The result is a schedule that looks aligned on paper but is often disconnected from shop-floor realities. Machines and labor are booked on jobs that cannot start due to a lack of materials, work is released to the floor before components are available, and high-priority orders are inadvertently starved while lower-priority orders consume critical parts.

This historical reliance on limited pegging functionality and manual date setting is understandable. True, end-to-end, dynamic pegging can be computationally intensive, especially across thousands of orders, multi-level BOMs, and constantly changing schedules. But with the exponential growth in computing power and modern optimization techniques, it is now possible to continuously recalculate detailed, order-level relationships in near real time, opening the door to a new paradigm.

Aligning Flow Instead of Dates: How Supply Allocation Works

Supply Allocation starts with the understanding that a customer order build is not a collection of isolated tasks. Rather, it is a system of tightly related work orders that must flow together. To achieve this level of synchronization, Supply Allocation builds direct linkages between every supply order (what is being made or bought) and every demand order (what is needed for the customer or parent job) across all BOM levels.

This means alignment is no longer defined by manually maintained date fields. Rather, it is defined by flow.
- Every child order knows exactly which parent order it supports and how its timing affects the overall build.
- The system can schedule the entire build structure as one extended process, ensuring that upstream and downstream work move in lockstep.
- When conditions change—late material, capacity constraints, priority shifts—the impact on the entire structure is visible in a single, coherent model rather than scattered across screens and independent work orders.
- Dates across the entire build are automatically recalculated from these relationships, so schedules stay aligned without constant manual due date resets.
By treating the order as a system, Supply Allocation transforms planning from a reactive exercise in chasing dates into a proactive discipline focused on orchestrating flow through the value stream.

The Value and Outcomes of Supply Allocation

When every work order in a multilevel build is aligned through Supply Allocation, the operational benefits are immediate and measurable.

Maximized throughput: Supply is strictly aligned with demand, so every part on the shelf, on order, or in production has a clearly defined destination within a customer order.

Improved transparency: Users gain an at-a-glance view into the full structure of an order, from top-assembly to the lowest level component, including which steps are driving delays.

Increased efficiency: Planners no longer spend hours manually validating material availability or stitching together order relationships because the system automatically surfaces the critical path and late path.

Reduced delays and stoppages: Jobs are released to the floor only when they are truly buildable, reducing stalled work, WIP, and the confusion that comes from jobs waiting on missing parts.

More reliable delivery: Promise dates are grounded in validated supply-demand linkages, leading to more consistent demand linkages, on-time delivery, and higher customer confidence. Increased transparency improves expediting of at-risk orders.

Supply Allocation: More Vital Than Ever

These days, manufacturers are under pressure from every direction: tighter lead times, more product variants, labor shortages, and supply chain volatility. In an increasingly chaotic environment, the traditional approach of manually coordinating hundreds of work orders through due dates and spreadsheets is not just inefficient—it’s often unworkable.

Supply Allocation addresses this challenge by supporting a production schedule that reflects an order’s true build structure and stays synchronized as conditions evolve. Instead of discovering misalignment when an order is already late, planners identify emerging delays early and act before customers feel the impact. For organizations pursuing digital transformation or Lean initiatives, Supply Allocation becomes a foundational capability: It exposes the real flow of work and materials, making it easier to identify bottlenecks, prioritize improvements, and sustain gains over time.

If you’re ready to move beyond the limitations of your current systems, schedule a live demo. Our representatives can show you how Supply Allocation manages complex build structures, highlights emerging late paths, and supports the kind of reliable delivery your customers expect.

Request a Demo
March 17, 2026
3 Prerequisites to a Modern Demand-Driven Supply Chain

In 2010, Gartner estimated that manufacturers outsourced about 70% of the products they make to other manufacturers. I haven’t seen a recent statistic, but that still feels about right.

So, it only makes sense that, for most manufacturers, implementing modern demand-driven or pull-manufacturing techniques will require collaboration with many partners across the entire supply chain.

Before you can collaborate with your supply chain partners, you need to get your own house in order. Here are three things you need to do:

#1 Digitize. The demand-driven supply chain runs on data—the right data in the hands of the right people at the right time. Before you can make this happen, you may need to address a few data issues in your own operations. It’s not unusual for us to work with companies that have two or three ERP systems, especially if they’ve grown through acquisition, in addition to several point solutions for things like maintenance, scheduling, time management and so on.

For those of you who have been in the industry a while, the idea of a data standardization and consolidation project may send you reaching for the Tylenol bottle. You’ll be glad to know that with the right technology, you can get through this relatively headache-free. For example, we helped Orbital ATK, an aerospace manufacturer of custom composite parts, connect over 100 individual data sources to collect data from more than 61,000 tags. At a recent conference, Paul Hardy, Application Architect at Orbital ATK, gave a fascinating presentation on how they use this data to improve operations. You can access his talk on our YouTube page here.

#2 Synchronize. The next prerequisite is to synchronize everything (people, processes, materials, machines and data) at the order level. If production flow isn’t aligned to customer orders inside your own facilities, you can’t deliver the right data to your supply chain partners.

This synchronization alone can have a dramatic impact on performance. We worked with GIW Materials, a manufacturer of heavy-duty centrifugal slurry pumps, to help them lower cycle times and improve on-time performance. The crux of the solution was to optimize product flow and control cycle time by synchronizing everything to orders: pattern information, flasks, combination equipment, engineering revisions and capacity. The impact was so noticeable to their customers that GIW doubled their revenues in two and a half years. You can access their case study here.

#3 Visualize. Once you’ve digitized your data and synchronized production flow to customer orders, you need to put the right data into the hands of the right people. These days, there is almost no limit to the amount of data we can collect. In the demand-driven supply chain, more is not necessarily better because you can easily overwhelm people. Here are the three areas where you should focus your efforts:

Demand and supply – visibility and synchronization of the demand signal, material and resource availability to drive uninterrupted production flow.

Production flow indicators – visibility into stock buffer levels, constraints, shop floor events, etc.

Priorities – adapting to demand and communicating changes across the supply chain.

Pulling it all together

If the products you manufacture are heavily reliant on outsourced components or services, you may not have the luxury of waiting long before you roll out your demand-driven manufacturing approach to the rest of your supply chain. This was the case with a microchip manufacturer we recently worked with.

A growing part of this manufacturer’s business was to receive parts from OEMs and supply them to contract manufacturers. Both the OEMs and the contract manufacturers gave the manufacturer forecasts, but the formats were different, and like all forecasts, not always reliable. As a result, they were constantly in reactive mode, manually standardizing data from multiple sources in spreadsheets while juggling variances in supply and demand. We worked with them to consolidate the data into a single screen view that showed real-time, aggregated replenishment, inventory, and order status information. We also created a platform that allowed them to provide similar views to their OEM and contract manufacturing partners.

Related resource: White paper: E2E Supply Chain Visibility Technology is Here

November 20, 2017

“test”